18+Legal-age users only. Before visiting any external platform, confirm your local laws and the operator's terms.
Methodology · Transparent scoring

Betting Platform Review Methodology

A ranking method should be public, explainable, and reviewable. The weights below are template defaults that can be adjusted for your compliance process.

Weights

Seven scoring dimensions

Do not let a single promotional factor dominate rankings. Transparency, safety, and user protection should sit at the center.

Licensing transparency
20%

Whether the operator clearly shows regulatory information, ownership, and terms access.

Payment security
20%

Clarity around deposits, withdrawals, fees, processing windows, and security notices.

Mobile experience
15%

Readability, filtering, touch targets, and page speed at 360px width.

Market coverage
15%

Clear categorization of sports, live markets, esports, and other sections without overstatement.

Support and languages
10%

Visibility of support access, response windows, and language coverage.

Responsible tools
10%

Budget limits, time reminders, self-limits, and help-resource access.

Terms clarity
10%

How easy it is to review promotions, withdrawals, account limits, and jurisdiction restrictions.

Editorial workflow

  • Collect: Public operator information, terms, payment notes, and support access.
  • Verify: Manually check jurisdiction availability, license display, and responsible gambling access.
  • Document: Keep update dates, evidence links, and change notes.
  • Update: Adjust rankings or pause listings when material changes occur.

Commercial independence

If pages include commercial links, disclose them clearly. Commercial relationships should not override the published methodology or hide risk information.

FAQ

Methodology FAQ

Can commercial relationships affect scores?

The template recommends stating that commercial relationships do not override the published methodology. Paid placements should be clearly labeled.

How often should scores be updated?

Review key operators monthly and update promptly when licensing, payment, terms, or jurisdiction details change.

Why not rank by promotions only?

Promotional terms can change and often carry conditions. Long-term evaluation should prioritize transparency, safety, and user protection.